Roulette Simulator

Roulette Betting Systems

Complete comparison of all popular betting strategies - the good, the bad, and the dangerous.

๐ŸŽฏ The Truth About Betting Systems

โŒ

No System Beats the House Edge

Every system eventually loses to the mathematical advantage of the casino.

๐Ÿ“Š

All Outcomes Are Independent

Past results don't affect future spins. Each spin has the same odds.

๐Ÿ’ก

Systems Manage Risk, Not Odds

They change how you bet, but not your mathematical expectation.

๐Ÿ“‹ Quick Comparison Table

SystemTypeRisk LevelComplexityVerdict
MartingaleProgressiveVery HighSimpleDangerous - avoid with real money
Reverse MartingaleProgressiveMediumSimpleBetter than Martingale but still risky
D'AlembertProgressiveMediumSimpleSafer alternative to Martingale
FibonacciProgressiveMediumMediumBetter than Martingale, still flawed
LabouchereProgressiveHighComplexComplex and still dangerous
Flat BettingFlatLowSimpleSafest approach for consistent play
Oscar's GrindProgressiveLow-MediumMediumConservative but ineffective long-term
ParoliProgressiveLow-MediumSimpleFun short-term system

๐Ÿ“– Detailed System Reviews

Martingale

Double your bet after every loss

Risk Level
Very High

โœ… Pros

  • โ€ข Simple to understand
  • โ€ข Quick profits when winning
  • โ€ข Works short-term

โŒ Cons

  • โ€ข Exponential bet growth
  • โ€ข Table limits break system
  • โ€ข Catastrophic losses possible
Final Verdict: Dangerous - avoid with real money

Reverse Martingale

Double your bet after every win

Risk Level
Medium

โœ… Pros

  • โ€ข Capitalizes on winning streaks
  • โ€ข Limited downside risk
  • โ€ข Easy to implement

โŒ Cons

  • โ€ข Loses profits quickly
  • โ€ข Winning streaks are rare
  • โ€ข Requires discipline
Final Verdict: Better than Martingale but still risky

D'Alembert

Increase bet by 1 unit after loss, decrease by 1 after win

Risk Level
Medium

โœ… Pros

  • โ€ข Slower progression than Martingale
  • โ€ข More conservative approach
  • โ€ข Easier to manage bankroll

โŒ Cons

  • โ€ข Still vulnerable to long losing streaks
  • โ€ข Slower recovery
  • โ€ข Doesn't overcome house edge
Final Verdict: Safer alternative to Martingale

Fibonacci

Follow Fibonacci sequence for bet sizing

Risk Level
Medium

โœ… Pros

  • โ€ข Mathematical foundation
  • โ€ข Slower progression
  • โ€ข Interesting system

โŒ Cons

  • โ€ข Complex to remember
  • โ€ข Still progressively dangerous
  • โ€ข No mathematical edge
Final Verdict: Better than Martingale, still flawed

Labouchere

Use a number sequence to determine bet amounts

Risk Level
High

โœ… Pros

  • โ€ข Flexible system
  • โ€ข Can set profit targets
  • โ€ข Engaging to play

โŒ Cons

  • โ€ข Very complex
  • โ€ข Can require large bets
  • โ€ข Long sequences possible
Final Verdict: Complex and still dangerous

Flat Betting

Bet the same amount every time

Risk Level
Low

โœ… Pros

  • โ€ข Predictable losses
  • โ€ข Easy bankroll management
  • โ€ข No complex rules

โŒ Cons

  • โ€ข Slow to recover losses
  • โ€ข Can be boring
  • โ€ข No profit advantage
Final Verdict: Safest approach for consistent play

Oscar's Grind

Increase bet only after wins, aiming for small profits

Risk Level
Low-Medium

โœ… Pros

  • โ€ข Conservative progression
  • โ€ข Limited risk
  • โ€ข Steady approach

โŒ Cons

  • โ€ข Very slow progress
  • โ€ข Complex rules
  • โ€ข Still no mathematical edge
Final Verdict: Conservative but ineffective long-term

Paroli

Double bets after wins for a set number of times

Risk Level
Low-Medium

โœ… Pros

  • โ€ข Limits losses
  • โ€ข Capitalizes on streaks
  • โ€ข Simple rules

โŒ Cons

  • โ€ข Gives back profits quickly
  • โ€ข Streaks are rare
  • โ€ข No long-term edge
Final Verdict: Fun short-term system

๐Ÿ“š System Categories Explained

๐Ÿ”ฅ Progressive Systems

Change bet size based on previous results. Most increase bets after losses.

Examples: Martingale, D'Alembert, Fibonacci
Risk: Can lead to very large bets

๐Ÿ“Š Flat Betting

Same bet amount every time, regardless of previous results.

Examples: Fixed amount betting
Risk: Predictable and manageable

๐ŸŽฏ Positive Progression

Increase bets after wins instead of losses.

Examples: Reverse Martingale, Paroli
Risk: Lower risk than negative progression

๐Ÿ† Our Recommendations

๐Ÿฅ‡

Best: Flat Betting

Bet the same amount every time. It's boring but safe, and you'll lose money at a predictable rate. Perfect for casual play and bankroll management.

๐Ÿฅˆ

Acceptable: D'Alembert or Fibonacci

If you must use a progressive system, these are safer than Martingale. Still dangerous long-term, but progression is slower.

๐Ÿšซ

Avoid: Martingale and Labouchere

These systems can quickly lead to catastrophic losses. The risk far outweighs any potential reward. Stay away unless you're playing with play money.

๐Ÿงฎ The Mathematical Reality

Why No System Can Win Long-Term

Every spin is independent with the same house edge. No betting pattern can change the fundamental mathematics of the game. The house edge ensures the casino wins over time, regardless of how you bet.

What Systems Actually Do

Betting systems change the distribution of your wins and losses, but not the expected value. You might win big occasionally or lose slowly, but the end result is the same.

The Gambler's Fallacy

Many systems are based on the false belief that past results affect future outcomes. In roulette, each spin is completely independent of all previous spins.

Test Any System Safely

Try all these betting systems in our free simulator. See for yourself why they don't work long-term.

๐Ÿงช Test Systems Now