D'Alembert vs Flat Betting
Which roulette betting strategy is right for you? Compare these two popular systems side-by-side.
D'Alembert Strategy
Increase bet by one unit after a loss, decrease by one after a win.
moderatesimplenegative progression
Flat Betting Strategy
Bet the same amount on every spin regardless of wins or losses.
conservativesimpleflat progression
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | D'Alembert | Flat Betting |
|---|---|---|
| Style | moderate | conservative |
| Complexity | simple | simple |
| Progression Type | negative | flat |
| Best For | Conservative players | Beginners |
D'Alembert
Pros
- ✓Very slow and safe progression
- ✓Easy to understand
- ✓Lower variance than Martingale
Cons
- ✗Takes longer to recover losses
- ✗Still cannot beat house edge
- ✗Profit potential is limited
Flat Betting
Pros
- ✓Simplest strategy possible
- ✓Predictable outcomes
- ✓No bet escalation
Cons
- ✗No recovery mechanism
- ✗Slow grind toward expected loss
- ✗Less exciting gameplay
Quick Summary
Quick Simulation: D'Alembert on Red
Starting balance: $1,000 | Base bet: $10 | European roulette odds
Quick Simulation: Flat Betting on Red
Starting balance: $1,000 | Base bet: $10 | European roulette odds