D'Alembert vs Labouchere
Which roulette betting strategy is right for you? Compare these two popular systems side-by-side.
D'Alembert Strategy
Increase bet by one unit after a loss, decrease by one after a win.
moderatesimplenegative progression
Labouchere Strategy
Create a sequence of numbers and bet the sum of first and last. Cross out on win, add on loss.
aggressivecomplexnegative progression
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | D'Alembert | Labouchere |
|---|---|---|
| Style | moderate | aggressive |
| Complexity | simple | complex |
| Progression Type | negative | negative |
| Best For | Conservative players | Experienced players |
D'Alembert
Pros
- ✓Very slow and safe progression
- ✓Easy to understand
- ✓Lower variance than Martingale
Cons
- ✗Takes longer to recover losses
- ✗Still cannot beat house edge
- ✗Profit potential is limited
Labouchere
Pros
- ✓Flexible and customizable
- ✓Clear profit target
- ✓Can be adjusted mid-session
Cons
- ✗Complex to track
- ✗Sequence can grow quickly
- ✗Bets escalate during losing streaks
Quick Summary
Quick Simulation: D'Alembert on Red
Starting balance: $1,000 | Base bet: $10 | European roulette odds
Quick Simulation: Labouchere on Red
Starting balance: $1,000 | Base bet: $10 | European roulette odds