D'Alembert vs Oscar's Grind
Which roulette betting strategy is right for you? Compare these two popular systems side-by-side.
D'Alembert Strategy
Increase bet by one unit after a loss, decrease by one after a win.
moderatesimplenegative progression
Oscar's Grind Strategy
Increase bet by one unit after a win, keep same after a loss. Goal is to win one unit per cycle.
conservativemoderatepositive progression
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | D'Alembert | Oscar's Grind |
|---|---|---|
| Style | moderate | conservative |
| Complexity | simple | moderate |
| Progression Type | negative | positive |
| Best For | Conservative players | Patient players |
D'Alembert
Pros
- ✓Very slow and safe progression
- ✓Easy to understand
- ✓Lower variance than Martingale
Cons
- ✗Takes longer to recover losses
- ✗Still cannot beat house edge
- ✗Profit potential is limited
Oscar's Grind
Pros
- ✓Very conservative approach
- ✓Limits bet increases
- ✓Good for extended play
Cons
- ✗Slow profit accumulation
- ✗Can take many spins to complete a cycle
- ✗Boring for action-seekers
Quick Summary
Quick Simulation: D'Alembert on Red
Starting balance: $1,000 | Base bet: $10 | European roulette odds
Quick Simulation: Oscar's Grind on Red
Starting balance: $1,000 | Base bet: $10 | European roulette odds