Fibonacci vs Flat Betting
Which roulette betting strategy is right for you? Compare these two popular systems side-by-side.
Fibonacci Strategy
Follow the Fibonacci sequence for bet sizing, moving forward after losses and back after wins.
aggressivemoderatenegative progression
Flat Betting Strategy
Bet the same amount on every spin regardless of wins or losses.
conservativesimpleflat progression
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Fibonacci | Flat Betting |
|---|---|---|
| Style | aggressive | conservative |
| Complexity | moderate | simple |
| Progression Type | negative | flat |
| Best For | Moderate sessions | Beginners |
Fibonacci
Pros
- ✓Slower progression than Martingale
- ✓Based on famous mathematical sequence
- ✓More sustainable for longer sessions
Cons
- ✗Still leads to large bets over time
- ✗More complex to remember
- ✗Cannot overcome house edge
Flat Betting
Pros
- ✓Simplest strategy possible
- ✓Predictable outcomes
- ✓No bet escalation
Cons
- ✗No recovery mechanism
- ✗Slow grind toward expected loss
- ✗Less exciting gameplay
Quick Summary
Quick Simulation: Fibonacci on Red
Starting balance: $1,000 | Base bet: $10 | European roulette odds
Quick Simulation: Flat Betting on Red
Starting balance: $1,000 | Base bet: $10 | European roulette odds