Roulette Simulator

Fibonacci vs Oscar's Grind

Which roulette betting strategy is right for you? Compare these two popular systems side-by-side.

Fibonacci Strategy

Follow the Fibonacci sequence for bet sizing, moving forward after losses and back after wins.

aggressivemoderatenegative progression

Oscar's Grind Strategy

Increase bet by one unit after a win, keep same after a loss. Goal is to win one unit per cycle.

conservativemoderatepositive progression

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureFibonacciOscar's Grind
Styleaggressiveconservative
Complexitymoderatemoderate
Progression Typenegativepositive
Best ForModerate sessionsPatient players

Fibonacci

Pros

  • Slower progression than Martingale
  • Based on famous mathematical sequence
  • More sustainable for longer sessions

Cons

  • Still leads to large bets over time
  • More complex to remember
  • Cannot overcome house edge

Oscar's Grind

Pros

  • Very conservative approach
  • Limits bet increases
  • Good for extended play

Cons

  • Slow profit accumulation
  • Can take many spins to complete a cycle
  • Boring for action-seekers

Quick Summary

Simpler Option

Easier to learn and follow:

Fibonacci

More Conservative

Slower bet progression:

Oscar's Grind

More Aggressive

Faster bet progression:

Fibonacci

Quick Simulation: Fibonacci on Red

Starting balance: $1,000 | Base bet: $10 | European roulette odds

Quick Simulation: Oscar's Grind on Red

Starting balance: $1,000 | Base bet: $10 | European roulette odds

Test Both Strategies

Try Fibonacci and Oscar's Grind in our free simulator.

Play Free Roulette