Labouchere vs Flat Betting

Which roulette betting strategy is right for you? Compare these two popular systems side-by-side.

Labouchere Strategy

Create a sequence of numbers and bet the sum of first and last. Cross out on win, add on loss.

aggressivecomplexnegative progression

Flat Betting Strategy

Bet the same amount on every spin regardless of wins or losses.

conservativesimpleflat progression

10,000 Simulated Sessions Each: Labouchere vs Flat Betting

We ran both systems through 10,000 simulated sessions on a European wheel under identical conditions: $1,000 bankroll, stopping at $1,500 (win), $500 (loss), or 500 spins.

Measured over 10,000 sessionsLabouchereFlat Betting
Sessions ended in profit46.2%25.7%
Average session result−$84−$132
Average spins per session47490
Average worst drawdown−$408−$244
Best single session$525$500
Worst single session−$960−$500
Hit the table limit0.5%

In this run, Labouchere came out ahead on both measures — more sessions in profit and a smaller average loss. The house edge still won overall: both averaged a losing session.

How Labouchere sessions ended

Losing sessionsWinning sessions
Lost over $800
1.1%
Lost $400–$800
52.3%
Lost $100–$400
0.4%
Lost up to $100
0%
Won up to $100
0%
Won $100–$400
0%
Won $400–$800
46.2%
Won over $800
0%

How Flat Betting sessions ended

Losing sessionsWinning sessions
Lost over $800
0%
Lost $400–$800
11.9%
Lost $100–$400
42.7%
Lost up to $100
17%
Won up to $100
12.4%
Won $100–$400
15%
Won $400–$800
1.1%
Won over $800
0%

Methodology: fixed-seed runs from our open simulation engine, using the same settings as the strategy guides and interactive simulators — the numbers here match each system's guide page and can be reproduced there. Both systems lose on average because no betting progression changes the house edge; the comparison shows how differently they get there.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureLabouchereFlat Betting
Styleaggressiveconservative
Complexitycomplexsimple
Progression Typenegativeflat
Best ForExperienced playersBeginners

Labouchere

Pros

  • Flexible and customizable
  • Clear profit target
  • Can be adjusted mid-session

Cons

  • Complex to track
  • Sequence can grow quickly
  • Bets escalate during losing streaks

Flat Betting

Pros

  • Simplest strategy possible
  • Predictable outcomes
  • No bet escalation

Cons

  • No recovery mechanism
  • Slow grind toward expected loss
  • Less exciting gameplay

Quick Summary

Simpler Option

Easier to learn and follow:

Flat Betting

More Conservative

Slower bet progression:

Flat Betting

More Aggressive

Faster bet progression:

Labouchere

Quick Simulation: Labouchere on Red

Starting balance: $1,000 | Base bet: $10 | European roulette odds

Quick Simulation: Flat Betting on Red

Starting balance: $1,000 | Base bet: $10 | European roulette odds

Test Both Strategies

Try Labouchere and Flat Betting in our free simulator.

Play Free Roulette