Martingale vs Fibonacci
Which roulette betting strategy is right for you? Compare these two popular systems side-by-side.
Martingale Strategy
Double your bet after each loss to recover losses plus a small profit when you win.
very-aggressivesimplenegative progression
Fibonacci Strategy
Follow the Fibonacci sequence for bet sizing, moving forward after losses and back after wins.
aggressivemoderatenegative progression
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Martingale | Fibonacci |
|---|---|---|
| Style | very-aggressive | aggressive |
| Complexity | simple | moderate |
| Progression Type | negative | negative |
| Best For | Short sessions | Moderate sessions |
Martingale
Pros
- ✓Simple to understand and follow
- ✓Guarantees profit on each winning sequence
- ✓Works well in short term
Cons
- ✗Exponential bet growth can wipe out bankroll
- ✗Table limits can break the system
- ✗Large bets for small rewards
Fibonacci
Pros
- ✓Slower progression than Martingale
- ✓Based on famous mathematical sequence
- ✓More sustainable for longer sessions
Cons
- ✗Still leads to large bets over time
- ✗More complex to remember
- ✗Cannot overcome house edge
Quick Summary
Quick Simulation: Martingale on Red
Starting balance: $1,000 | Base bet: $10 | European roulette odds
Quick Simulation: Fibonacci on Red
Starting balance: $1,000 | Base bet: $10 | European roulette odds